Apple offers Xcode as a free download for Mac users, but charges for Final Cut Pro. Both are powerful software tools, so why is there a difference in pricing?
What’s Apple’s reasoning behind making Xcode free but keeping Final Cut as a paid product?
Hey! I’ve been in this situation myself, and here’s how I see it. Xcode is free because Apple wants to encourage developers to build apps for macOS, iOS, watchOS, and tvOS.
By making Xcode free, anyone can start learning Swift, experimenting with iOS projects, or submitting apps to the App Store.
It’s essentially an investment for Apple—they earn when developers publish apps that generate revenue in the App Store.
So, Xcode being free is more about ecosystem growth than the value of the software itself.
to get more insights on how to get started with follow this blog on : How To Use Xcode for Windows To Build iOS Apps | LambdaTest
On the other hand, Final Cut Pro is a professional video editing suite aimed at pros and serious hobbyists.
Apple charges for it because it’s a specialized tool with advanced features that provide tangible value for filmmakers and content creators.
Professionals expect robust software, and they’re willing to pay a one-time fee (or subscription in other cases) for high-end editing capabilities.
I personally bought Final Cut Pro for some freelance projects, and it feels worth every penny given the speed and power it provides.
Putting it together: Apple uses different strategies for different audiences.
Xcode = free → Apple wants more apps in the ecosystem.
Final Cut Pro = paid → Apple earns revenue from high-end professional users who need premium tools.
It’s also about adoption: free Xcode means students, hobbyists, and indie devs can learn coding with zero barrier, while Final Cut Pro targets a niche market that’s willing to invest.