Hey folks!
With the growing popularity of GitHub Actions and GitLab CI/CD, I’m genuinely curious — why is Jenkins still a go-to CI/CD platform in 2024?
What are the current trends you’re seeing in the CI/CD space, and in what scenarios would developers choose Jenkins over these newer, more integrated platforms?
Would love to hear your thoughts and experiences.
I must say that’s a good question @nehagupta.1798! Let me try to explain.
Despite the rise of GitHub Actions and GitLab CI/CD, Jenkins continues to hold its ground due to its flexibility and extensive plugin ecosystem. It supports a wide range of integrations, including deployment pipelines, monitoring tools, and testing services.
Jenkins is ideal for more complex workflows, especially for teams who require fine-tuned control over their build, test, and deployment processes.
In my opinion, one of the key reasons to choose Jenkins is its ability to work seamlessly with legacy systems and integrate with diverse tools. If your project involves complex build configurations and integration with tools like LambdaTest for cross-browser testing, Jenkins’ flexibility can provide the necessary power and customization.
It’s also well-suited for large teams that need to manage many concurrent builds and tests. While newer platforms like GitHub Actions have become increasingly popular, Jenkins remains the tool of choice for intricate, enterprise-level CI/CD pipelines.
Let me know if you have more questions!
Hah! I must say @mark-mazay has provided a great answer, but lemme try this as well. 
What I have in store is GitHub Actions. It’s quickly gaining traction, particularly for teams already leveraging GitHub for version control.
Its deep integration with GitHub repositories offers an excellent experience for continuous integration and delivery, especially suited for smaller projects or teams aiming for simplicity. The learning curve is minimal, and the configuration is straightforward, making it a popular choice among modern DevOps teams.
For teams utilizing LambdaTest for cross-browser testing, GitHub Actions provides a more seamless integration. Incorporating LambdaTest into your GitHub Actions workflow for automated cross-browser testing is relatively simple to set up.
When compared to Jenkins, GitHub Actions can be more approachable for small teams or projects with less complex pipelines, making it a great option if ease of use and faster setup are your priorities.
Hello @nehagupta.1798 
, while the previous answers offer great insights, I wanted to add a bit more to your understanding.
For teams seeking a robust platform that delivers a comprehensive DevOps experience, GitLab CI/CD stands out as a strong contender. It cleverly combines version control, CI/CD, and monitoring all within a single environment. This makes it an ideal choice for those who value an all-in-one solution, where the journey from source code to deployment is seamlessly integrated.
GitLab boasts powerful automation capabilities, and its Auto DevOps feature can really simplify the setup of CI/CD pipelines, especially for teams looking for a more streamlined and less hands-on experience.
When it comes to integrating with LambdaTest, GitLab CI/CD makes it easy to automate your cross-browser testing as a key part of your pipeline. While Jenkins often remains the go-to for highly customized workflows, GitLab’s inherent simplicity and the advantage of having everything unified in one platform make it a compelling choice for teams aiming for full DevOps automation without the complexity of managing multiple disparate tools.
Furthermore, its built-in security features and monitoring capabilities help you maintain high code quality throughout your entire CI/CD lifecycle.
Hope you find this additional information useful! 