In my Spring application context, I define a map like this:
<util:map id="someMap" map-class="java.util.HashMap"
key-type="java.lang.String" value-type="java.lang.String">
<entry key="some_key" value="some value" />
<entry key="some_key_2" value="some value" />
</util:map>
Then, in my Java class:
private Map<String, String> someMap = new HashMap<>();
someMap = (HashMap<String, String>) getApplicationContext().getBean("someMap");
Eclipse shows a warning: Type safety: Unchecked cast from Object to HashMap<String, String>.
What causes this unchecked cast java
issue, and how can I fix it?
I’ve been working with Java for over a decade now, and yeah, this one comes up pretty often. If you’re getting an unchecked cast java
warning and you’re absolutely sure about the type (like Map<String, String>
), you can go ahead and suppress it safely using:
@SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
private Map<String, String> someMap = (HashMap<String, String>) getApplicationContext().getBean("someMap");
Why?
This approach silences the warning while trusting your own config. Just don’t forget—it’s safe only if you’re 100% confident about that bean type.
Totally agree with @joe-elmoufak —and I’ve run into this too after switching between multiple Spring projects. But one small improvement I’d suggest: go with the interface type instead of the concrete implementation. It’s cleaner and avoids unnecessary casting, which helps with that same unchecked cast java
issue.
private Map<String, String> someMap = (Map<String, String>) getApplicationContext().getBean("someMap");
Why?
You’re keeping it generic (which Spring returns anyway), and you still maintain type safety without tying yourself down to a HashMap
.
Use ApplicationContext#getBean with Generics (Best Practice)
Spring supports generic type inference with this method:
private Map<String, String> someMap = getApplicationContext().getBean(“someMap”, Map.class);
Why?
Eliminates unchecked cast warnings without suppression.