How to define TypeScript array of objects with type?

Product Support LT Browser
,
#1

How can I define a TypeScript array of objects?

I’m creating an array of objects in TypeScript as follows: userTestStatus xxxx = { “0”: { “id”: 0, “name”: “Available” }, “1”: { “id”: 1, “name”: “Ready” }, “2”: { “id”: 2, “name”: “Started” } };

How do I declare the type for this correctly? Is it possible to define the type inline, or would I need a separate type definition? I want to replace xxxx with a type declaration so that TypeScript will alert me if I accidentally try something like userTestStatus[3].nammme.

Could someone explain the correct way to define a TypeScript array of objects here?

#2

Hello,

To define a TypeScript array of objects using a type alias, you can start by creating a UserStatus type to describe the structure of each object within the array. This allows TypeScript to properly check the types and prevent errors, such as typos in property names.

Here’s how you can define the type alias and the array of objects:

type UserStatus = {
  id: number;
  name: string;
};

const userTestStatus: { [key: string]: UserStatus } = {
  "0": { id: 0, name: "Available" },
  "1": { id: 1, name: "Ready" },
  "2": { id: 2, name: "Started" }
};

Breakdown of the code:

  1. UserStatus Type Alias: The type alias UserStatus describes an object that has two properties: id (a number) and name (a string). This ensures that all objects in the array follow the same structure.
  2. userTestStatus Object: The object userTestStatus uses an index signature { [key: string]: UserStatus }, which allows it to have keys of type string and values of type UserStatus.
  3. Type Safety: With this approach, TypeScript will catch errors like a misspelled property name (e.g., nammme instead of name), ensuring better code quality and reducing runtime issues.

This method provides clear structure and type safety, making your code easier to maintain and less prone to errors.

#3

Hello,

To define the userTestStatus object with inline types effectively, you can utilize TypeScript’s index signature. This approach maps string keys to objects that have id and name properties. It’s a concise and efficient way to ensure type safety while allowing TypeScript to validate the object properties.

Here’s how you can define it:

const userTestStatus: { [key: string]: { id: number; name: string } } = {
  "0": { id: 0, name: "Available" },
  "1": { id: 1, name: "Ready" },
  "2": { id: 2, name: "Started" }
};

This method not only defines the structure clearly but also ensures that any future values added to userTestStatus follow the specified format with the correct id and name types. TypeScript will help catch any errors if the values deviate from this structure, making your code more reliable.

#4

Hello All,

A great solution to enforce structure in TypeScript is by using an enum for the userTestStatus keys, along with defining an array of objects as the type. This approach not only ensures proper key names but also validates property names, making it easier to spot any mismatches during development. Here’s an improved example to illustrate how this works:

enum StatusKeys {
  Available = "0",
  Ready = "1",
  Started = "2"
}

const userTestStatus: { [key in StatusKeys]: { id: number; name: string } } = {
  [StatusKeys.Available]: { id: 0, name: "Available" },
  [StatusKeys.Ready]: { id: 1, name: "Ready" },
  [StatusKeys.Started]: { id: 2, name: "Started" }
};

Explanation:

  • Enum: We define StatusKeys with string values ("0", "1", "2"), making sure they are descriptive and fixed.
  • userTestStatus: An object whose keys are constrained by the StatusKeys enum. Each key maps to an object containing id (a number) and name (a string). This structure ensures that TypeScript will enforce both key names and property types, providing better safety against errors and making the code easier to maintain.

This solution also promotes consistency, ensuring that you always use valid keys (Available, Ready, Started), and guarantees that the properties of the objects are properly matched.

Thank you!