I’m new to Java and just started learning the language. I noticed that nextInt()
is used to get an integer from the user, but for strings, I have to use nextLine()
. Why is there a difference? Does this have any connection to how java generic interface
works in handling different data types?
I’ve worked with Java input handling quite a bit, and one approach I often fall back on is using a java generic interface. It helps cleanly abstract input logic.
public interface InputHandler<T> {
T readInput(Scanner sc);
}
This way, you can create different implementations for reading integers (sc.nextInt()
) or strings (sc.nextLine()
), while keeping your input code neat and scalable.
Yeah, @raimavaswani’s approach is pretty solid. I’ve also been in situations where a java generic interface was helpful, but sometimes I needed more flexibility on the fly. That’s where a generic method really shines.
public static <T> T getInput(Scanner sc, Class<T> type) {
return type == Integer.class ? type.cast(sc.nextInt()) : type.cast(sc.nextLine());
}
This allows you to dynamically choose the input type at runtime, without tying it to a specific implementation of the interface. It complements the java generic interface approach, especially in more dynamic use cases.
Totally agree with both of you. From my experience in building reusable components, wrapping this logic into a class gives even better structure. Think of it as leveling up the java generic interface pattern.
class GenericScanner<T> {
Scanner sc = new Scanner(System.in);
public T getInput(Class<T> type) {
return type == Integer.class ? type.cast(sc.nextInt()) : type.cast(sc.nextLine());
}
}
This not only uses the flexibility of generics but also encapsulates the scanner itself, making input handling modular and clean—while still rooted in the java generic interface concept.