Great! Now let’s test it. For n = 3, the expected output should be:
2 7 6
9 5 1
4 3 8
After applying the fix, the correct output is generated.
Alternative Approach: Using a Different Algorithm
Instead of manually managing the movement, you could track the last position and derive the next position using a helper function:
private static int[] getNextPosition(int[][] square, int row, int col) {
int newRow = (row - 1 + square.length) % square.length;
int newCol = (col + 1) % square.length;
return square[newRow][newCol] == 0 ? new int[]{newRow, newCol} : new int[]{row + 1, col};
}
Then inside the loop:
int[] next = getNextPosition(magicSquare, row, column);
row = next[0];
column = next[1];
This keeps the logic modular and easier to debug.