Best Methods to Convert Number to String in JavaScript

Product Support
, ,
#1

What is the best method to JavaScript convert number to string while considering factors like speed, clarity, and memory efficiency? Here are some examples to illustrate the different approaches:

  • String(n)
  • n.toString()
  • "" + n
  • n + ""
#2

From my experience, using String(n) is one of the most intuitive and clear ways to JavaScript convert number to string. It’s explicit, which makes your code easy to understand at a glance. This method works across different data types, not just numbers. For example:


const num = 123;

const str = String(num); // "123"

It’s straightforward, readable, and doesn’t require much explanation when collaborating with others. While it’s not necessarily the fastest, it strikes a good balance between clarity and efficiency.

#3

I’ve worked with many JavaScript projects, and another great way to JavaScript convert number to string is by using n.toString(). It’s a bit more method-based compared to String(n), but it does the job well. This approach is widely adopted, especially because it doesn’t rely on extra operators, keeping the syntax clean. For example:


const num = 456;

const str = num.toString(); // "456"

It performs similarly to String(n) in most cases, but some developers may prefer it for the simplicity of chaining methods, especially when working with object-oriented code. One thing to note is that toString() can be applied directly to variables, making it slightly more flexible.

#4

I’ve often found that for quick, concise code, string concatenation like "" + n is an interesting alternative to JavaScript convert number to string. Although it’s compact, it may not be as clear to developers unfamiliar with this approach. It’s popular in situations where brevity is prioritized:


const num = 789;

const str = "" + num; // "789"

However, it’s worth noting that while it works, it’s less explicit than the other methods and might confuse beginners or those reading the code later. In terms of performance, it’s a lightweight option, but in larger codebases, the lack of clarity could lead to minor maintainability issues.