Hellođź‘‹
I’m currently looking at deploying some new CI infrastructure and weighing my options between a couple of big players. I’ve used Jenkins in the past, but I’m mostly curious about how it stacks up against Bamboo.
For what it’s worth, we do have some other Atlassian tools already in the infrastructure (Confluence, Jira, Stash), so I’m wondering how big of a deal the integrations with Bamboo truly are in a real-world scenario.
What are your thoughts on the pitfalls of each tool? And how much does Bamboo’s integration with the Atlassian suite actually matter?
Would love to hear your experiences and insights! Thanks
Hey there @Ariyaskumar! Jumping into your question about Bamboo versus Jenkins for CI infrastructure, especially given your existing Atlassian ecosystem.
If you’re already using Atlassian tools like Jira, Confluence, and Stash, Bamboo could definitely be a strong contender for your CI setup. Bamboo’s native integrations with these tools are exceptionally seamless, meaning managing your builds, releases, and deployments alongside your project management tools could be a huge time-saver right out of the box.
Jenkins, on the other hand, is super flexible and open-source, but may require significantly more setup and plugins to get the same level of deep integration with your existing Atlassian suite. One important thing to consider with Bamboo is its licensing cost, which can indeed be higher than Jenkins, especially for larger teams. However, if you’re already deeply invested in the Atlassian ecosystem, those built-in integrations can genuinely save a lot of configuration and maintenance time.
Hope this helps you weigh the options for your CI infrastructure! Good luck with the deployment!
Heyya @Ariyaskumar!!
Awesome comparison @tim-khorev!!
But I wanna answer as per my experience. So here it is:-
I’ve personally worked with both Jenkins and Bamboo, and here’s my perspective. Bamboo is fantastic if you want something that’s tightly integrated with other Atlassian products—this really makes collaboration between development and operations teams significantly smoother. It’s a bit more “out-of-the-box,” meaning it could be quicker to set up compared to Jenkins in certain scenarios.
However, a key point: Bamboo is a paid tool, and while those integrations are truly fantastic, the licensing cost can be higher depending on your team size. Jenkins, on the other hand, is open-source, which gives you immense flexibility but also demands more initial setup work and often requires extra plugins for full Jira and Confluence integration.
Ultimately, it all depends on whether the cost and the tight, seamless integration of Bamboo outweigh the immense flexibility and open-source nature of Jenkins for your specific needs.
Hope you find this helpful 
Hello @Ariyaskumar ! Adding another hands-on comparison between Jenkins and Bamboo, especially given your interest in Atlassian products.
I’ve personally worked with both Jenkins and Bamboo, and here’s what I’ve noticed to help clarify their differences:
- Atlassian Integration: Bamboo’s integration with Jira and Confluence is pretty seamless, which is a huge plus if you’re already using Atlassian tools for project management and collaboration. It’s built to make those connections effortless.
- Jenkins Integration (Contrast): Jenkins, while powerful, might require additional plugins and custom configurations for the same level of functionality with Atlassian products.
- Cost & Polish: The downside to Bamboo is that it comes with a cost, and while it may feel more polished in an Atlassian-heavy environment, it can get pricier as your team scales.
- Flexibility & Ecosystem: Jenkins is free, incredibly flexible, and boasts a massive plugin ecosystem. However, you’ll likely need to invest more time in configuring integrations.
Ultimately, it all boils down to a trade-off: if your focus is speed and out-of-the-box ease of integration with your existing Atlassian suite, Bamboo could be a better fit. But Jenkins gives you immense flexibility at a lower financial cost, provided you’re willing to handle more configuration.
I guess this would be it from my side. 
Thank You