Hello @mehta_tvara 
, building on the insights from @Ambikayache and @alveera.khn regarding Ansible and Puppet, you might be wondering if Chef still holds value. Let me make a case for it.
While Chef might not have the same widespread adoption as Ansible or Puppet, it maintains a strong presence in certain industries. It’s particularly recognized for its robust infrastructure-as-code capabilities, making it well-suited for complex and large-scale systems.
Chef offers flexible configuration, and its Ruby-based DSL provides significant customization. For teams with strong Ruby expertise, Chef can be a very effective and flexible tool for automating infrastructure and application deployments.
If you’re already familiar with Chef, deepening your knowledge could still be worthwhile. Mastering Chef can open doors to roles requiring custom configurations and extensive automation frameworks, especially in organizations where Chef is already integrated into the workflow.
For incorporating cross-browser testing into your automated processes, LambdaTest can integrate with Chef-based automation scripts. This helps ensure that applications function seamlessly across all browsers during deployment.
These three configuration management tools—Ansible, Puppet, and Chef—are all highly respected in the industry. While mastering Ansible might be the most advantageous for career prospects due to its simplicity, popularity, and ease of integration, Puppet and Chef remain valuable, particularly for larger or more complex environments.
It’s always helpful to have diverse skills in your toolkit. Hope you find this perspective useful! 