How to use BiDi to capture JavaScript errors in browser console?
How one can ensure that their test scripts remain relevant and compatible with future browser releases?
Can WebDriver with BiDi better than Cypress/Playwright?
How is CDP different from Web API used by Cypress?
When would WebDriver BiDi be fully ready? Any timelines?
Will WebDriver BiDi add support to WebdriverIO?
Is Cypress demanding in the market over Selenium WebDriver?
Are we going to see more AI integrations in automation tools ?
Can you use WebDriver BiDi with low code platforms?
What’s in-store for WebDriver BiDi. Also, will CDP be ever deprecated once WebDriver BiDi gains more adoption or will they co-exist in the future?
What are the benefits of using WebDriver BiDi in terms of handling complex web interactions and dynamic page elements?
Can we use any waiting strategies in BiDi WebDriver like Selenium WebDriver?
Can we simulate network calls using WebDriver BiDi?
What is scope of classic automation ways like this WebDriver BiDi, when we are seeing multiple AI based automation tools are coming in market?
Hi there,
If you couldn’t catch the session live, don’t worry! You can watch the recording here:
Additionally, we’ve got you covered with a detailed session blog:
The impact of WebDriver BiDi in the near future could be significant in the field of browser automation. Here are some potential impacts:
-
Enhanced Browser Automation: WebDriver BiDi’s bidirectional communication can lead to more advanced and responsive browser automation, allowing for quicker and more dynamic control over web interactions and actions.
-
Improved Testing Efficiency: The protocol’s real-time communication capabilities can make testing more efficient and accurate, reducing wait times and enhancing the speed of test execution.
-
Advanced Automation Scenarios: WebDriver BiDi may support complex automation scenarios, including those involving multiple browser tabs or windows, pop-ups, and modern web technologies.
-
Cross-Browser Compatibility: If WebDriver BiDi works seamlessly across various browsers and platforms, it can simplify cross-browser testing and ensure compatibility across different environments.
-
Developer Productivity: Developers can benefit from WebDriver BiDi’s capabilities for automated UI testing, contributing to the overall quality of web applications.
-
CI/CD Integration: WebDriver BiDi could enhance the automation pipeline for Continuous Integration and Continuous Delivery (CI/CD), ensuring thorough testing during the software development lifecycle.
-
Competitive Advantage: Organizations that adopt WebDriver BiDi effectively may gain a competitive advantage by delivering high-quality web applications faster and with fewer issues.
Hi,
WebDriver BiDi have the potential to significantly shape the future of browser automation. It offers numerous benefits when it comes to test automation:
-
Fast and Bi-directional Communication: The ability to have bidirectional communication and real-time updates between the browser and the test script is a game-changer. It can greatly enhance the efficiency of browser automation by reducing wait times and improving synchronization. Faster and more reliable tests are a critical requirement in today’s agile software development environments.
-
Low-Level Controls: Providing low-level controls for interactions and complex scenarios is invaluable, especially for web applications with JavaScript-heavy or browser-specific features. This capability allows testers to simulate real-world scenarios and thoroughly test even the most intricate aspects of an application. It aligns with the need for comprehensive testing in modern software development.
-
Cross-Browser Support: Following W3C standards for cross-browser compatibility is a significant advantage. It simplifies the testing process across different browsers, reducing the effort required to adapt test scripts for each platform. This compatibility is vital as web applications continue to expand their reach across various browsers and devices.
Considering these advantages, WebDriver BiDi has the potential to streamline browser automation, making it more efficient, precise, and adaptable to modern web development practices. It aligns well with the demands of fast-paced development cycles and the need for comprehensive testing across diverse environments.
Hi,
Ensuring that your test scripts remain relevant and compatible with future browser releases is crucial for maintaining the effectiveness of your browser automation efforts. Here are some strategies to help you achieve this:
-
Regular Updates and Maintenance: Stay proactive by regularly updating and maintaining your test scripts. This includes checking for updates in the browser automation tools and libraries you use. Browser vendors often release new versions with changes and improvements, so keeping your tools up-to-date is essential.
-
Use WebDriver and Standardized APIs: Utilize WebDriver and standardized APIs for browser automation. WebDriver is designed to be a cross-browser automation protocol that abstracts browser-specific details. Using it ensures a level of compatibility across different browsers, making it easier to adapt your scripts to new browser releases.
-
Test Across Multiple Browsers: Don’t limit your testing to a single browser. Test your web applications across multiple browsers, including popular ones like Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge, and Internet Explorer (if applicable). This helps identify browser-specific issues early and ensures that your scripts work across a variety of environments.
-
Regression Testing: Implement robust regression testing. Create a suite of tests that cover critical functionalities of your web application. Whenever a new browser version is released, run these tests to check for any regressions or issues introduced by the update. Automate this process as much as possible.
-
Compatibility Matrix: Maintain a compatibility matrix that documents which browser versions your test scripts are known to work with. Update this matrix whenever you test your scripts against new browser releases. This helps you quickly identify which scripts may need adjustments for compatibility.
-
Browser Vendor Documentation: Stay informed about browser vendor documentation. Browser vendors often provide release notes and guides on how their browsers have changed. Review these resources to understand any updates that may impact your scripts.
-
Community and Forums: Be part of browser automation communities and forums. Engage with other automation professionals who may have encountered similar challenges. They can provide insights and solutions to adapt your scripts to new browser versions.
-
Parallel Testing: Implement parallel testing, where you run your scripts on multiple browser versions simultaneously. This helps identify compatibility issues early and allows you to make necessary adjustments as soon as a new browser release is detected.
-
Continuous Integration (CI): Incorporate browser testing into your CI/CD pipeline. Automate the process of running tests against different browser versions whenever changes are made to your application code. This ensures ongoing compatibility.
-
Plan for Browser Updates: Anticipate browser updates by monitoring the release schedules of major browsers. Allocate time in your testing schedule for validating your scripts against new releases as they become available.
-
Testing Tools and Frameworks: Choose testing tools and frameworks that have active development and support. Tools that keep pace with browser updates and offer timely updates and patches are more likely to remain compatible with new browser versions.
By following these strategies, you can proactively address compatibility challenges and ensure that your test scripts remain effective and relevant across future browser releases.
Here are the differences between Chrome DevTools Protocol (CDP) and Cypress Web API:
-
Underlying Technology:
-
CDP (Chrome DevTools Protocol): CDP is a low-level protocol provided by the Chrome browser itself. It allows developers and automation tools to communicate directly with the Chrome browser instance, enabling fine-grained control over browser features and access to various debugging and performance-related capabilities.
-
Cypress Web API: Cypress uses a higher-level JavaScript API to interact with the browser. It doesn’t rely on CDP but provides its own set of commands and APIs to control and interact with the browser for end-to-end testing.
-
-
Scope and Purpose:
-
CDP: CDP is not limited to Chrome and can be used with other Chromium-based browsers as well. It’s primarily designed for debugging, profiling, and performance analysis of web applications.
-
Cypress Web API: Cypress is specifically designed for end-to-end testing of web applications. While it can perform actions similar to CDP, its primary focus is on testing features like running assertions, simulating user interactions, and validating web application behavior.
-
-
Ease of Use:
-
CDP: CDP is a lower-level protocol that requires more technical expertise to use effectively. It’s often used by developers and testers who need fine-grained control over the browser for specific debugging and analysis tasks.
-
Cypress Web API: Cypress provides a more user-friendly and expressive API for writing tests. It’s designed to be accessible to a wider audience, including developers and testers with varying levels of technical expertise.
-
-
Integration:
-
CDP: CDP can be integrated into various automation and testing frameworks, but it often requires additional development effort to build custom automation scripts and workflows.
-
Cypress Web API: Cypress offers a comprehensive testing framework with built-in support for test runners, assertions, and test organization. It’s designed to be an all-in-one solution for end-to-end testing, reducing the need for extensive custom scripting.
-
-
Community and Ecosystem:
-
CDP: CDP has a strong community and ecosystem for debugging and profiling tasks. It’s widely used for web development purposes but may require additional libraries or tools for comprehensive testing.
-
Cypress Web API: Cypress has a dedicated community and ecosystem focused on end-to-end testing. It provides plugins and extensions to enhance its functionality for testing purposes.
-
If you’ve been involved in software development for a while, you know that testing is a continuous process that ensures the final product aligns with the initial objectives set at the beginning of a project. Testing, whether manual or automated, plays a critical role in achieving this goal. Automation testing, in particular, is gaining traction due to its speed and cost-efficiency.
Among the many tools and frameworks available for automated testing, Cypress and Selenium are two popular choices. The decision between them often boils down to your project’s requirements and characteristics, especially when it comes to how your application performs across various browsers and devices.
Cypress:
- If your application is heavily focused on the front-end or built with modern frameworks like React or Angular, Cypress is an excellent choice. It’s known for its simplicity and doesn’t demand extensive programming expertise, making it user-friendly for testers.
Selenium:
- For complex, end-to-end testing scenarios, Selenium is a robust option. Its flexibility and support for multiple programming languages make it suitable for a wide range of testing scenarios.
The choice between Cypress and Selenium depends on the nature of your application and your testing needs. Cypress excels in front-end-centric testing and offers ease of use, while Selenium’s versatility makes it suitable for complex and diverse testing requirements. It’s crucial to assess your project’s specific demands and consider factors like the application’s technology stack and the skill set of your testing team when making this decision.