Hey there!
I would love to help you here to write and organize your first test case using Cypress. Follow these steps:
- Setup Cypress: Install Cypress in your project using npm by running the command:
npm install cypress --save-dev
Then open Cypress using:
npx cypress open
This will launch the Cypress Test Runner.
-
Create a Test File: In the cypress/integration folder, create a new test file, for example, firstTest.spec.js. This file will contain your test cases.
-
Write a Basic Test Case: Start by describing the purpose of your test suite and individual tests. Use the describe and it functions to organize your tests.
// cypress/integration/firstTest.spec.js
describe(‘First Cypress Test’, () => {
it(‘should visit the example page and check the title’, () => {
// Visit a URL
cy.visit(‘https://example.com’);
// Check if the title is correct
cy.title().should('include', 'Example Domain');
});
});
This simple test navigates to a webpage and verifies the title includes the expected text.
- Organize Tests:
-
Use describe Blocks: Group related test cases together. Each describe block can represent a specific feature or functionality.
-
Use before and before Hook: Set up common preconditions, such as logging in or navigating to a specific page, to avoid code duplication.
-
Use Custom Commands: If you have repetitive actions, such as logging in, create custom commands in the cypress/support/commands.js file to simplify your tests.
// cypress/support/commands.js
Cypress.Commands.add(‘login’, (username, password) => {
cy.visit(‘/login’);
cy.get(‘#username’).type(username);
cy.get(‘#password’).type(password);
cy.get(‘#loginButton’).click();
});
- Structure the Test Files:
-
Organize your test files under different folders within cypress/integration based on features or modules, such as login, dashboard, etc.
-
Create a consistent naming convention for test files, like featureName.spec.js or componentName.spec.js.
- Run the Tests: You can run your tests in the Cypress Test Runner or via the terminal using the command:
npx cypress run
By following these steps, you can effectively write and organize your first Cypress test case, ensuring a clean and maintainable test structure from the beginning.
Hope this helped you !
Hello !
From my learnintg in Cypress i say that Cypress itself doesn’t have a sandbox environment per se, but it offers a rich set of example test cases right out of the box when you set up your project. Anna encouraged beginners to start with these example tests to understand the basic commands and structure before moving on to writing their own.
Hope this helped 
Hey there!
I would like to address this query as I attended this session and from what I can gather is that Anna highlighted that Cypress’s intuitive interface, detailed documentation, and the vast library of community-contributed plugins make it incredibly beginner-friendly. The ability to see test execution in real time and the built-in command log help new users understand what’s happening under the hood, reducing the intimidation factor that often accompanies test automation.
Hope this was helpful
Hey there !
I would like to help you iut here the basic components of a Cypress test include the describe and it blocks for test structure, hooks like beforeEach for setting up states, and commands like cy.visit() and cy.get() for interactions. Anna recommended organizing tests by feature or user flow and placing reusable commands or custom assertions in the cypress/support folder for a clean architecture.
Hope I was able to resolve your query
Hey there !
If you are new to Cypress you can start by installing Cypress via npm and setting up a basic project structure. Anna cautioned against writing overly complex tests at the outset. Focus on getting familiar with Cypress commands and writing simple, deterministic tests that are easy to debug. Avoid chaining too many actions in a single test and ensure your application is in the desired state before making assertions.
hope I was able to guide you
Hey there!
From the session Anna’s advice was to focus on the basics of testing first—understand manual testing thoroughly before jumping into automation. Networking with professionals, contributing to open-source projects, and staying curious are also key strategies. Start with a tool like Cypress, which is beginner-friendly, and gradually explore more complex frameworks as your confidence grows.
Hello there!
Being a Cypress tester from my leanriung I say that Cypress is primarily designed for end-to-end testing, it can be used for some performance metrics like page load times using the cy.clock() and cy.tick() commands. However, Anna mentioned that for more comprehensive performance testing, tools like Lighthouse or dedicated performance testing frameworks like JMeter are more appropriate. Cypress should be used in conjunction with these tools to ensure all bases are covered.
Hope I was helpful
Hey,
From the session, as i recall, Anna emphasized that a solid understanding of JavaScript and the DOM is crucial when using Cypress. Familiarity with asynchronous programming concepts, such as promises and callbacks, is also beneficial. Additionally, a good grasp of HTML and CSS helps when selecting elements for interaction.
Gald to help
Hey,
As i attended this session, Anna emphasized that a solid understanding of JavaScript and the DOM is crucial when using Cypress. Familiarity with asynchronous programming concepts, such as promises and callbacks, is also beneficial. Additionally, a good grasp of HTML and CSS helps when selecting elements for interaction.
Happy to help
Hey there !
Being a Cypress users , Cypress has built-in restrictions due to the Same-Origin Policy, but you can handle cross-origin navigation by using cy.origin() to manage multiple domains. However, if your test involves multiple domain navigations, you may need to use plugins or a different testing framework like Playwright that natively supports such scenarios.
Hey there!
Based on my experience Currently, Cypress is tightly coupled with JavaScript, and there are no official plans to support other languages. In the session, Anna hinted that while this might seem limiting, it allows Cypress to offer a more optimized and seamless experience for JS users, which is a core part of its appeal.
Hope this helps
Hello there !
Being a Cypress user, fixtures in Cypress are used to store and manage test data. They allow you to separate static data like JSON objects or text files from your test scripts. Anna suggested using fixtures to mock API responses or to use predefined sets of data, making your tests cleaner and easier to maintain.
Hope this helps
Hi,
From the session, what i recall is that Anna mentioned that while Cypress offers fast and reliable test execution within the context of a single browser, Playwright provides faster execution across multiple browser contexts. For complex applications requiring cross-browser support, Playwright’s speed and flexibility might give it an edge over Cypress.
Hope this was insightful.
Hi there,
From my experince in automated testing, Creating a good framework in Cypress involves using page objects or custom commands for reusability, organizing test data with fixtures, and using hooks to handle test setup and teardown. Anna recommended keeping tests modular and DRY (Don’t Repeat Yourself) to ensure long-term maintainability.
Hello there !
Using cy.wait() with a static time is generally discouraged. Instead, use commands like cy.get() with options like { timeout: 10000 }, or assertions like .should(‘be.visible’) to wait for elements dynamically. This makes your tests more robust and reduces flakiness caused by timing issues.
Hello there,
I understand your query; this usually happens when you switch from Selenium to Cypress; I would say there isn’t much difference in architecture, but I will share my learning here.
Cypress operates directly in the browser, offering real-time reloading and native access to the browser environment, which is great for front-end testing. Selenium, on the other hand, operates outside the browser, supporting a wider range of browsers and platforms. Anna suggested choosing Cypress for projects that need rapid test development and debugging, while Selenium is better suited for comprehensive cross-browser testing.
Hope I was helpful
Hey
Since I have worked with both frameworks before, you must keep in mind that when comparing Playwright and Selenium, it’s essential to consider their capabilities, performance, and use cases. Both tools are powerful for browser automation and end-to-end testing, but they have unique strengths and differences.
Playwright:
-
Modern API and faster execution.
-
Supports multiple browsers (Chromium, Firefox, WebKit).
-
Built-in features like auto-waiting, network interception, and tracing.
-
Supports JavaScript, TypeScript, Python, Java, C#.
Selenium:
-
Wider Language Support (Java, Python, C#, etc.).
-
Mature ecosystem with extensive integrations.
-
Suitable for legacy applications and broad browser support.
-
May require more setup and is generally slower than Playwright.
Choose Playwright for modern web apps needing speed and advanced features. Choose Selenium for legacy systems and broader language support.
Hope i was able to give you better view
Hey there!
I would like to answer this on behalf of the speaker, as she highlighted that basic JavaScript knowledge is sufficient to get started with Cypress. However, as you advance, understanding more complex JS concepts like promises, async/await, and working with the DOM will become necessary to write more effective tests.
hope this helps
Hello,
Being a Cypress user, I would suggest that before diving into Cypress, having a good foundation in JavaScript, HTML, and CSS is important. Anna recommended brushing up on JS fundamentals and understanding the basics of web development to make the most of what Cypress offers.
Hi,
From what I gathered in the session, I would suggest placing your element locators in a separate selectors.js or similar file. This keeps your locators centralized and reusable, allowing you to pass different data sets to your test cases without duplicating locator references.
Hope I was helpful